A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan
Blog Article
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded on the allegations as such they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Usually, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes People in crystal clear violation of proven case law) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and also the case isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition within the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner as well as private respondents and will choose care of the many areas of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be produced and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also guarantee respect with the family drop in accordance with law and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been obtained. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is effectively-settled that while considering the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of every one of the qualified candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who're found to become most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored via the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part in the respondent department.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down from the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits in the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
ten. Based around the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition is not considered maintainable and is therefore liable to be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case regulation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first in the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth from the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that get more info the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.